UK-built vehicles risk exclusion from the EU's Industrial Acceleration Act unless London aligns its trade stance.
Renault Group CEO François Provost wants the UK inside the EU's tariff wall on Chinese electric vehicles. He said so publicly. The ask is pointed: match the EU's import levies or risk losing access to manufacturing support being written into the bloc's Industrial Acceleration Act. Brexit complicates every sentence of this.
The EU's Industrial Acceleration Act, currently in development as of early 2025, places automotive manufacturing at its centre and ties preferential terms to production within a defined regional supply chain. As things stand, vehicles and components built in the UK sit outside that boundary, according to Renault Group's public position on the legislation. The EU already imposed additional duties of up to 35.3 percent on Chinese-built battery electric vehicles in October 2024, according to the European Commission's Official Journal, Volume 67, published October 2024. The UK has not followed.

Provost Makes the Call
François Provost, Chief Executive Officer of Renault Group, stated that the UK should form part of whatever regional manufacturing arrangement the EU constructs around the Industrial Acceleration Act. He did not hedge. His argument rests on supply-chain geography: Renault operates plants across France, Spain, Romania, and Portugal, and sources components from UK-based suppliers — notably through the Nissan Sunderland facility's feeder network, which feeds parts into the broader alliance production web. Provost's comments arrived as Brussels was still drafting the IAA's final structure. That timing matters. Lobbying during a drafting phase carries more weight than lobbying after a text is locked. Renault Group is not alone in watching this closely, but Provost put his name to a public position that others have so far expressed only off the record. For trade coverage tracking the full arc of EU protective measures, see our EU trade barriers and regulation tracker for 2026.
What the Tariff Gap Actually Looks Like
The arithmetic of the current divergence is not abstract. The European Commission's October 2024 countervailing duty decision added levies of between 17.0 percent and 35.3 percent on top of the existing 10 percent MFN import duty applied to Chinese-built BEVs entering the EU. BYD drew 17.0 percent additional duty; Geely, 18.8 percent; SAIC, 35.3 percent. Combined with the baseline, SAIC vehicles now face a total EU tariff of 45.3 percent. The UK's standard import duty on passenger cars from China remains 6.5 percent. That gap — 45.3 percent versus 6.5 percent on the highest-rate vehicle — is 38.8 percentage points. A Chinese BEV priced at £30,000 ex-factory lands in the EU at roughly £43,590 in combined duties at the SAIC rate; the same vehicle lands in the UK at £31,950. Renault sells the Renault 5 E-Tech from approximately £22,995 in the UK. The competitive pressure differential is not theoretical.
The IAA Exclusion Problem
The crux of Provost's concern is geographic, not merely rhetorical. Renault Group's public position, as reported in Autocar Business in 2025, frames the issue this way: the UK should be "part of any EU ecosystem for automotive manufacturing" — even if that requires the introduction of import tariffs on Chinese cars. That conditional — "even if" — acknowledges the political cost to London. Post-Brexit trade policy has leaned toward openness; the UK-China trade relationship generated £89.7 billion in total goods trade in 2023, according to the UK Office for National Statistics, Trade in Goods Statistical Bulletin, published February 2024. Accepting EU-mirroring tariffs on Chinese EVs would strain that relationship. Provost's framing does not resolve that tension. It simply states that the industrial logic of the IAA makes UK inclusion worth the friction.

The Alignment Problem Brussels Has Not Solved
Here is what does not add up. The EU's Industrial Acceleration Act is designed to strengthen regional production, yet the UK — which hosts Nissan's Sunderland plant, one of Europe's highest-volume single-site EV producers, building the Nissan Leaf and preparing for next-generation electric models — currently sits outside the IAA's preferential perimeter. Sunderland produced 108,027 vehicles in 2023, according to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders' Production Report, published January 2024. Those vehicles and the components flowing into them would not automatically qualify for IAA support or incentives as drafted. Renault Group, through its Nissan Alliance relationship, has a direct financial stake in Sunderland's output. Provost is not making a generic trade argument. He is protecting a specific node in a specific supply chain. What Renault Group has not confirmed publicly is whether it has formally submitted this position to either the UK Department for Business and Trade or to the European Commission's DG Trade during the IAA consultation period.
Who Feels This First
If the UK does not align, the most immediate pressure falls on Nissan Motor Co. and its Sunderland workforce of approximately 6,000 direct employees. Components exported from UK suppliers into EU assembly lines could face reclassification under IAA eligibility rules, raising costs for Renault's plants in Douai and Flins. Stellantis operates Vauxhall's Ellesmere Port plant — now producing the Vauxhall Combo Electric — and has already warned in its February 2024 submission to the UK Automotive Council that trade divergence between London and Brussels adds friction costs it estimates at hundreds of millions of pounds over a model lifecycle. Carlos Tavares, then Stellantis CEO, put a public figure on it: regulatory misalignment between the UK and EU adds "up to €3.4 billion" in cumulative cost exposure across the group's European operations, according to Stellantis's full-year results presentation, February 2024. Renault Group has not published an equivalent figure for its own UK exposure.
The UK government's own Automotive Sector Deal, last updated in 2021 and not renewed as of the date of publication, contains no mechanism for aligning import tariff policy with EU countervailing duties. The deal is silent on third-country EV levies entirely. A formal IAA consultation response from the UK Department for Business and Trade had not been made public as of April 2025. The complete Renault Group model history and specifications are catalogued in the Global Auto Index manufacturer database.